Aims

To support the free and open dissemination of research findings and information on alcoholism and alcohol-related problems. To encourage open access to peer-reviewed articles free for all to view.

For full versions of posted research articles readers are encouraged to email requests for "electronic reprints" (text file, PDF files, FAX copies) to the corresponding or lead author, who is highlighted in the posting.

___________________________________________

Friday, February 2, 2007

Controlled study of brief personalized assessment-feedback for drinkers interested in self-help

Controlled study of brief personalized assessment-feedback for drinkers interested in self-help

Addiction (2007) 102 (2), 241–250.






T. Cameron Wild 1 School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, Cameron Wild, Addiction and Mental Health Research Laboratory, University of Alberta, 13–103 Clinical Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G3, Canada. E-mail: cam.wild@ualberta.ca ,

John A. Cunningham 2 3Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 3Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada and

& Amanda B. Roberts 4Public Health Agency of Canada, Alberta/NWT Branch, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

1School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 2Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 3Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada and 4Public Health Agency of Canada, Alberta/NWT Branch, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Cameron Wild, Addiction and Mental Health Research Laboratory, University of Alberta, 13–103 Clinical Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G3, Canada. E-mail: cam.wild@ualberta.ca

ABSTRACT
Aims
Brief alcohol interventions typically have been directed to heavy-drinking patients seeking primary health care and college students. This study examined the efficacy of mailing brief personalized assessment-feedback to interested drinkers recruited from the general public. We hypothesized that problem drinkers would benefit more from the intervention than individuals who were not problem drinkers.

Design
A two-arm, double-blinded, community-based randomized controlled trial with 6-month follow-up.

Setting and participants
A screening interview was administered to a stratified random sample of 10 014 Canadians 18 years of age and older (5621 women and 4393 men; M age = 43.3 years, SD = 15.99; response rate = 65.4%).

Intervention
Current drinkers interested in receiving alcohol self-help materials (n = 1727) were assigned randomly to receive brief personalized assessment-feedback on male and female population drinking norms by mail, or to a delayed-treatment control group, and were contacted 6 months later (76% retention rate).

Measurements
Problem drinking status at baseline [using sex-specific Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) cut scores], and frequency and quantity of alcohol use at follow-up.

Findings
Analysis of covariance identified the hypothesized interaction of baseline problem drinking status and treatment condition (P < 0.01). Among problem drinkers identified at baseline the intervention caused a 10.1% reduction in per-occasion binge drinking compared to controls, whereas there was no difference in binge drinking across conditions for non-problem drinkers.

Conclusions
The continuum of care for alcohol problems can be broadened by providing brief interventions to interested drinkers in the general population.